SOLUTIONS

Screen materials at the speed of ideas.

Band gap, elastic modulus, thermal conductivity, and spectroscopy across 73 elements — from first-principles physics at 3,600,000× the speed of DFT. Every result is mechanistically traceable. No ML. No database lookups.

0
ML parameters
313
Materials validated
3.6M×
faster than DFT
100%
traceable
Request Pilot Access Try the Demo

Capabilities

From composition to candidate shortlist.

Band gap screening

Electronic structure from composition. Classify metals, semiconductors, and insulators — then rank by target band gap.

🌡️

Thermal properties

Thermal conductivity, Debye temperature, and stability estimates for thermal management applications.

🔧

Mechanical properties

Elastic constants, bulk modulus, and structural stability from first principles.

📈

Spectroscopy

Predicted IR, UV-Vis, and Raman spectra to validate candidates against target signatures before synthesis.

🎯

Inverse search

Define target properties — band gap 1.1–1.5 eV, conductivity above threshold — and get materials that match.

📦

Batch screening

Screen entire composition libraries with exportable shortlists for DFT follow-up or synthesis.

New in Materials

Battery electrochemistry is now a dedicated decision layer.

FluxMateria now goes beyond bulk materials screening for batteries. The battery layer adds transport, degradation, electrolyte and coating fit, uncertainty, and prototype handoff in one workflow.

View materials module Battery case study
26.8s
Full local battery workflow
5 / 5
Scenario benchmark alignments
0.149 V
Holdout voltage MAE
4
Decision winners across the pipeline
Bulk: LiNiO2 Interface: LiMnPO4 Battery-native: LiMnO2 Build: Li4Ti5O12

Proven outcomes

Real-world results from commercial and academic validations.

Band Gap Accuracy

0.9% Error

Problem: Traditional band gap prediction requires expensive DFT or empirical fits.

Result: Achieved mean absolute error of <1% across 12 diverse III-V semiconductors using pure first-principles physics.

Mechanical Properties

First-Principles

Problem: Elastic constants (Cij, Bulk Modulus) typically require experimental calibration or complex simulations.

Result: Derived correct elastic moduli directly from crystal geometry and bond strength without fitted parameters.

Zero Calibration

No Fitting

Problem: Many "physics" codes rely on hidden empirical corrections that fail on novel materials.

Result: FluxMateria uses explicitly zero fitted parameters. Results hold even for materials outside standard training sets.

Not ML. Not a database lookup. A physics engine.

FluxMateria computes material properties from first-principles physics. Every prediction is a deterministic, mechanistic calculation that you can trace, audit, and reproduce.

0

Trained parameters

No neural networks. No fitted coefficients. No statistical correlations. Predictions derive from composition, crystal geometry, and fundamental physics — nothing else. New compositions work on day one.

100%

Mechanistically traceable

Every band gap, every elastic modulus, every thermal conductivity value has full provenance. Trace any property back through the physics. Same composition, same output, every time.

3.6M×

Faster than DFT

DFT-competitive accuracy at screening throughput. Explore entire composition spaces — not individual materials. Screen in seconds what DFT computes in days.

ML / Informatics Fast, but degrades outside training distribution. Black box. Requires curated datasets.
DFT / Ab Initio Accurate and traceable, but too slow for compositional screening. Hours per material.
FluxMateria Accurate, traceable, and fast. No training data. No compute queues.

Platform capabilities

Modular tools for materials discovery and characterization.

🔬

Materials

Production

82 validated materials across 14 categories. Band gap, effective mass, dielectric constants — from composition.

Learn more
📈

Spectroscopy

Production

IR, UV-Vis, and Raman predictions with peak assignment and confidence scoring.

Learn more
🎯

Inverse Search

Beta

Set property constraints and find materials that meet your spec across the composition space.

Learn more

Validated accuracy

Transparent benchmarks against experimental data. Full methodology available on request.

0.9%
Band gap MAE
100%
Pass rate
73
Elements supported
313
Materials validated
Full materials benchmarks →

Workflow: Band gap search

Find semiconductors with a target band gap for photovoltaic applications.

1

Define

Set target: band gap 1.1–1.5 eV, thermal conductivity > 10 W/mK

2

Search

Run inverse search across the composition space

3

Screen

Batch-compute properties for all candidate compositions

4

Rank

Sort by Pareto front: band gap vs. thermal conductivity

5

Validate

Predict spectra for top candidates

6

Export

Decision packet with full mechanistic provenance

See it on your materials

Bring your target compositions. We'll show you what FluxMateria predicts.

Interactive demo

No account needed. Enter a composition and see property predictions with full mechanistic provenance.

Try it now →

Pilot access

Upload a material library and screen the full composition space against your constraints.

Request Access →