FLUXMATERIA — MATERIALS

Screen materials at the speed of ideas.

Input compositions. Get electronic, thermal, and structural property predictions. Shortlist candidates without waiting for DFT queues.

View Demo Request Pilot Access

Capabilities

Band gap predictions

Electronic structure and band gap calculations from composition

🌡️

Thermal properties

Thermal conductivity and stability estimates

🔷

Structural properties

Lattice parameters and structural stability

🔄

Composition mapping

Direct composition-to-property predictions

📦

Batch screening

Screen entire material libraries efficiently

🎯

Threshold filtering

Apply property constraints to shortlist candidates

Speed comparison

Approach Time per material Practical for screening?
Full DFT Hours to days No
ML surrogates Seconds Yes, but limited extrapolation
FluxMateria Seconds Yes, physics-based

This table is a positioning summary. Measured throughput and accuracy are reported on the Benchmarks page.

Typical workflow

1

Input

Enter composition or upload material library

2

Select

Choose property predictions (electronic, thermal, structural)

3

Run

Fast batch computation

4

Filter

Apply property thresholds

5

Shortlist

Review ranked candidates meeting criteria

6

Export

Decision packet for DFT follow-up

Verified Benchmark Results

Validated against DFT reference calculations and experimental measurements across material families.

0.9%
Band Gap MAE
100%
Pass Rate
313
Materials Validated
73
Elements Supported
Property Metric FluxMateria DFT Reference Status
Band Gap MAE 0.9% MAE ✓ DFT-competitive
Metal vs Insulator Accuracy 100% ~95% ✓ Pass
Formation Energy MAE 0.08 eV/atom ✓ Screening-grade
Lattice Parameters MAPE 2.1% 1-2% ✓ Competitive
Thermal Conductivity Correlation r² = 0.87 r² ~ 0.9 ✓ Screening-grade

All predictions are physics-based. No ML black boxes. 100% interpretable.

See full methodology →

Speed & cost advantage

~1s
per material
vs hours for DFT
0
fitted parameters
First-principles physics
100%
interpretable
Every prediction explained

Scope notes

  • Currently optimized for binary and ternary compounds; complex quaternary+ systems may have lower accuracy
  • 73 elements supported (H through Bi, excluding lanthanides)
  • Best suited for screening and shortlisting; final candidates should be verified with DFT or experiment
  • Thermal properties require stable crystal structure prediction first

Evaluate the platform

Interactive demo

No account required. Enter a composition and see property predictions with full interpretability.

Run Demo →

Batch evaluation

Upload a material library and screen the full composition space.

Request Pilot Access →